For those who follow the MOOC debate, every day is Armageddon:The Last
Professors: The Corporate University and the Fate of the Humanities
[http://www.amazon.com/Last-Professors-Corporate-University-Humanities/dp/0823228606]
, “The Year of
While the interview was conducted with Dr. James Schirmer, James Schirmer is not
how I think of him or his work. My introduction to Schirmer’s work and presence
was through his presentation
Scholarship is, by its nature, open source.
Let me explain.
The open-source (or “free” or “libre”) software movement centers around a single
ideal: community ownership of software. Open-source software may or may not
Higher education needs more bravery. Digital pedagogy, or any experimental
critical pedagogy, is necessarily dangerous, often with real risks for both
instructors and students, much of which can be valuable for learning. But
Negotiated hybridity — of the physical and digital, of the professional and
social, of the individual and communal — is our natural state. Only since we
launchedHybrid Pedagogy [http://www.hybridpedagogy.com/](at last year’
I was roused from my teaching this week by the cacophony of tweets and blog
posts on the merits and pitfalls of tweeting another scholar’s ideas (the most
cited ones authored or
Audience has been a critical concern during our first five months at work on
Hybrid Pedagogy. We realize the need to consciously expand our audience — to
consider institutions and colleagues outside of the
Publishing and teaching can both terrify new academics, often to the point of
paralysis. Their mutual support for one another is often frustrated by
institutional demands. For example, the traditional workload split for
In celebration of Twitter’s 6th birthday this week, we offer an examination of
Twitter’s application to pedagogical and scholarly communities.
I was very excited when I conceived of the original title
I’ve been following some of the very different, but complementary conversations
about hybrid pedagogy emerging fromthis journal [http://www.hybridpedagogy.com/]
, as well as from thepostdoctoral seminar at Georgia Tech.
[http://techstyle.
In this
[http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/29/academic-publishers-murdoch-socialist]
article for the Guardian, George Monbiot calls academic publishing “economic
parasitism” and academic publishers “monopolists,” which brings up a broader
discussion